RE: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] RE: [PATCH v19] virtio-net: support inner header hash

[Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>]

> From: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org> On
> Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 3:07 AM

> > > Well SHOULD also does not mean "ok to just ignore".
> > >
> > > 	This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
> > > 	   may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
> > > 	   particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
> > > 	   carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
> > >
> > RECOMMENDED and SHOULD forces the device to support MMIO, which is
> not good.
> 
> You said this already. Let's not repeat ourselves please.
> 
> It's a single word. We need to work on a patch, we can argue about small detail
> once it's posted. It's not in your list of plans so I am guessing we need someone
> on Red Hat side to work on this?

Yes, I prefer to work together and before writing the patch.
As just DMA for config space is only point fix problem.
So lets discuss in new thread and improve this for config space and also other limitations (like support multi-address VQ).