Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] RE: [PATCH v19] virtio-net: support inner header hash

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:38:49AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> 
> > From: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org> On
> > Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin
> > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 3:07 AM
> 
> > > > Well SHOULD also does not mean "ok to just ignore".
> > > >
> > > > 	This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
> > > > 	   may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
> > > > 	   particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
> > > > 	   carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
> > > >
> > > RECOMMENDED and SHOULD forces the device to support MMIO, which is
> > not good.
> > 
> > You said this already. Let's not repeat ourselves please.
> > 
> > It's a single word. We need to work on a patch, we can argue about small detail
> > once it's posted. It's not in your list of plans so I am guessing we need someone
> > on Red Hat side to work on this?
> 
> Yes, I prefer to work together and before writing the patch.
> As just DMA for config space is only point fix problem.
> So lets discuss in new thread and improve this for config space and also other limitations (like support multi-address VQ).
> 

Interesting.  What is multi-address VQ?

-- 
MST