[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [virtio-comment] [PATCH v1 1/8] admin: Add theory of operation for device migration
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2023 5:19 PM > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:28:50AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > >>>> inflight descriptor tracking will be implemented by Eugenio in V2. > > > >>> When we have near complete proposal from two device vendors, you > > > >>> want to push something to unknown future without reviewing the > > > >>> work; does not > > > >> make sense. > > > >> Didn't I ever provide feedback to you? Really? > > > > No. I didnât see why you need to post a new patch for dirty page > > > > tracking, > > > when it is already present in this series. > > This is plain ignorance and shows non_cooperative mode of working in > technical committee. > > > I personally think it's fine to have multiple proposals on the table. > For example, current Zhu Lingshan's patch is clearly incomplete without > memory change tracking. > Why shouldn't he post a patchset demonstrating how that is supposed to work > in his view? > I am personally interested in seeing how is that > supposed to work - his latest proposal relies on migrating by > trapping memory accesses but DMA can't be trapped like this generally. > > In the end we want something addressing all use cases though and integrating > reasonably well with existing ecosystem. True. Let me fix comments of yours and Jason, which has some important points to cover in v2.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]