Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state

["Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>]

On 9/19/2023 4:31 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 1:34 PM
> > > In your previous email you wrote,
> > >
> > > 1. "so lets focus on LM topic, other than confidential computing."
> > > 2. "again, TDISP is out of spec and TDISP devices are not migratable."
> > >
> > >   From above two comments from you I understood it that way, you want to
> > focus now on the LM _other_than_ CC.
> > > How to read it differently?
> > You said:"Lingshan wanted to take this TDISP extension in future."
> Based on above two comments from you this is what I understand.
I am not a native speaker, but do you see I ever mentioned that
I want to take TDISP in future? Any verbs I used?
> > How do you conclude this statement? Did I ever said I want to take TDISP
> > extension in future?
> CC and TDISP goes hand in hand.
>
> So you want to consider TDISP extension now (and not in future)?
As I said before, CC and TDISP is out of spec, that means we should 
ignore them for now.
And I don't plan to take TDISP in future, you should not confuse the 
sentences.