RE: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit and vq state

[Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>]

> From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 2:09 PM
> 
> On 9/19/2023 4:31 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >> From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 1:34 PM
> >>> In your previous email you wrote,
> >>>
> >>> 1. "so lets focus on LM topic, other than confidential computing."
> >>> 2. "again, TDISP is out of spec and TDISP devices are not migratable."
> >>>
> >>>   From above two comments from you I understood it that way, you
> >>> want to
> >> focus now on the LM _other_than_ CC.
> >>> How to read it differently?
> >> You said:"Lingshan wanted to take this TDISP extension in future."
> >>
> > Based on above two comments from you this is what I understand.
> I am not a native speaker, but do you see I ever mentioned that I want to take
> TDISP in future? Any verbs I used?
> >> How do you conclude this statement? Did I ever said I want to take
> >> TDISP extension in future?
> > CC and TDISP goes hand in hand.
> >
> > So you want to consider TDISP extension now (and not in future)?
> As I said before, CC and TDISP is out of spec, that means we should ignore them
> for now.
> And I don't plan to take TDISP in future, you should not confuse the sentences.
Ah, I understood now that you do not plan TDISP in future.
Thanks.