[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fwd: Meeting reminder and how to review PIM WD14 for 20 March meeting
-------- Forwarded Message --------
We have a workshop meeting today at noon Eastern Daylight Time; we rescheduled for today so Michael would be available. The philosophy that I've followed with the PIM is to select an appropriate and useful subset of the expressive capabilities of RFC 5545 et al + Vavailability. The issues I (and our consumers of the PIM) have right now is how small is still useful. The key issues to address at this meeting are IMO (0) Complete issues related to synchronization with Vavailability Internet Draft 05 (it's going to Standards Track soon, but that's our reference). (1) How much of the recurrence set is necessary for Vavailability? We started with RRules, and then based on comments added EXDATE (Exception Dates to the recurrence). RDATE which are recurrence dates that don't fit a a pattern - and share the same _expression_ as EXDATE. So RRules, Rdate, and Exdate - see section 3.8.5 (p118) of RFC5545 for background for our discussion. (2) Should recurrence be attached to Gluons? There was a proposal to apparently add recurrence values to Intervals, which I believe I mistook from a comment. On further thought, recurrence of intervals confuses the semantics considerably; one could conceive of a use for recurrence on a gluon, which effectively shadows the gluon with a potentially unbounded number of additional gluons reflecting future instances of a business process. I have mixed feelings about the value of the this versus the additional complexity for M2M interpretation, which is another touchstone for PIM inclusion. Also relates to https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/WSCALENDAR-555 Thanks! bill On 3/13/15 11:45 AM, William Cox
wrote:
I suggest this order for your review of WD14. All links are public: |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]