[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Re: Are i035 and i061 dupes?
From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Dec 06, 2005 9:48 AM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] Re: Are i035 and i061 dupes?
They are definitely related. If I remember correctly i035 was opened to make sure we do something with anonymous URIs. Umit was going to track what happened with WSA and at the F2F I raised a concern that no matter what the WSA WG did it probably wouldn't satisfy all of our needs - especially w.r.t. piggy-backing of acks. Hence issue i061 was opened to cover that. I think i035 can be closed w/o action since WSA has text that describes what anonymous URIs means in the generic sense. And I think i061 is still needed to explain the new notion of piggy-backing and creation of new messages (for acks) where otherwise one would not be sent.
thanks
-Doug
"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com> 12/06/2005 12:33 PM
ToDoug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com> cc"wsrx" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org> SubjectAre i035 and i061 dupes?
In reviewing the issue list today I’m wondering if i035 and i061 are dupes of each other. They sure seem like it.
i035 What does 'anon' URI mean when used in AcksTo EPR?
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i035
i061 Anonymous AcksTo
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssues.xml#i061
Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]