[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] NEW ISSUE: Alternative approach for MaxMessage
Paul Fremantle wrote: > Title - Alternative approach for MaxMessage > Description - We solved the issue of some platforms not having a native > unsigned long by adding a MaxMessageNumber to Policy. Another simpler > approach would be to use max(signed long) as the limit, and ensure that > all implementations can support this. Did you mean 'signed long' or something like: <xs:simpleType> <xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedLong"> <xs:minInclusive value="1"/> <xs:maxInclusive value="9223372036854775807"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> -Anish -- > Justification - This is not a critical issue, but this is a simpler > approach, with fewer moving parts. > Target - core / design > Type: design > Proposal: > > Policy: > Remove lines 97-100 plus editorial fixup of following para. > Remove line 114 > Remove line 130-134 > > Core: > Update line 465 to state new limit. > Add a schema restriction on line 870 > > Paul > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]