RE: [ws-rx] New proposed issues 6/22-29 (with accepted issue numbers)

["Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>]

Here are the numbers for today’s accepted issues:

 

i140 - Proposed-1 Editorial, add sub-headings to fault descriptions

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00190.html

(same as msg number 185)

 

i141 - Proposed-2 Editorial,Sec 3.3 fault response to TerminateSequenceRequest is not specified.

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00192.html

Marked pending

 

i142 - Proposed-3 Editorial, Sec 3.5 Request Acknowledgement text assumesSequence is known

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00193.html

Marked pending with alternate proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00202.html

 

i143 Proposed-4 Editorial messages have to be received for them to beexamined: with new highlighting

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00200.html

(note replaces msg number 198)

 

i144 Proposed-5 Editorial (maybe) RMS MessageNumberRollover behavior unclear

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00212.html

 

i145 Proposed-6 design: Implications of Sequence Expiration not specified

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00216.html

 

i146 Proposed-7 Editorial Examples in Apx C lack CloseSequence

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00217.html

Closed with no action

 

i147 Proposed-8 Extensibility (or not) of the Protocol Elements

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00225.html

 

148 Proposed-9 Reword the Abstract

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00226.html

 

Proposed-10 Editorial namespace URI is incorrect

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00244.html

not accepted as an issue

 

i149 Proposed-11  Define the syntax used to refer to elements and attributes

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00246.html

Marked pending with proposal from TC call (wait for minutes)

 

i150 Proposed-12 Editorial nits in Section 4 wrt using fault names in wsrm spec

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200606/msg00265.html

Marked pending with first alternative in the proposal