RE: [ws-tx] Issue 32 - Requirement for MixedOutcome

["Ram Jeyaraman" <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>]

Mark,

Could you please provide the PDF line numbers in the referred document
that are relevant to this issue. Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ram Jeyaraman [mailto:Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:55 PM
To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-tx] Issue 32 - Requirement for MixedOutcome

This is identified as WS-TX issue 32. 

Please ensure follow-ups have a subject line starting "Issue 32 -"
(after any Re:, [ws-tx] etc.)

 ===================================

Issue name: Requirement for MixedOutcome

Issue type: spec

Owner: Mark Little (mark.little@jboss.com)

Reference documents:

WS-BA specification:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/17203/ws
tx-wsba-1.1-spec-cd-01.pdf 
<http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/17044/h
ttp://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/17129/wst
x-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-04.pdf> 

Description:

The MixedOutcome is not tested for in the interoperability scenarios 
(AtomicOutcome is). This either needs to be fixed, with some scenarios 
added, or we should remove the capability. I haven't seen any good 
arguments for why we should have this protocol within the 
BusinessActivity specification. If there is a requirement, then it seems

more appropriate for a separate model (i.e., specification) to host
this.

Proposed resolution:

Remove MixedOutcome