Re: [ws-tx] Issue 31 - Requirement for coordinator driven completion

[Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com>]

Section 3.2, lines 244-258.

Mark.


Ram Jeyaraman wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
>  
>
> Could you please provide the PDF line numbers in the referred document 
> that are relevant to this issue. Thanks.
>
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ram Jeyaraman [mailto:Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:53 PM
> To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ws-tx] Issue 31 - Requirement for coordinator driven completion
>
>  
>
> This is identified as WS-TX issue 31.
>
>  
>
> Please ensure follow-ups have a subject line starting "Issue 31 -"
>
> (after any Re:, [ws-tx] etc.)
>
>  
>
> ===================================
>
>  
>
> Issue name: Requirement for coordinator driven completion
>
>  
>
> Issue type: spec
>
>  
>
> Owner: Mark Little (mark.little@jboss.com)
>
>  
>
> Reference documents:
>
>  
>
> WS-BA specification:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/17203/ws
>
> tx-wsba-1.1-spec-cd-01.pdf
>
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/17044/h
>
> ttp://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/17129/wst
>
> x-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-04.pdf>
>
>  
>
> Description:
>
>  
>
> BusinessAgreementWithCoordinatorCompletion is not tested for in the
>
> interoperability scenarios. This either needs to be fixed, with some
>
> scenarios added, or we should remove the protocol. I haven't seen any
>
> good arguments for why we should have this protocol within the
>
> BusinessActivity specification. If there is a requirement, then it seems
>
>  
>
> more appropriate for a separate model (i.e., specification) to host
>
> this.
>
>  
>
> Proposed resolution:
>
>  
>
> Remove BusinessAgreementWithCoordinatorCompletion
>