[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Fw: [ws-tx] Issue 030 - consolidated refinement of Proposal 2
Mark Little wrote: > > WS-AT, currently: > > "The protocol faults defined in this section are generated if the > condition stated in the preamble is met. When used in a transaction > protocol, these faults are targeted at a destination endpoint > according to the protocol fault handling rules defined for that > protocol. " > > Since we know that WS-AT is a transaction protocol, this text looks > odd. I'd suggest: > > "The protocol faults defined in this section are generated if the > condition stated in the preamble is met. These faults are targeted at > a destination endpoint according to the fault handling rules defined > for that protocol. " But "that protocol" is this protocol! I think this is a mechanical transposition from WS-C. AT needs to say: "These faults are formulated as terminal notification messages in accordance with the rules laid out in Section 9, 'Use of WS-Addressing Headers'." Alastair
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]