[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Fw: [ws-tx] Issue 030 - consolidated refinement of Proposal 2
I'm happy to either change the "that" to "this" in my original text (which was a minimal update on the text Ian sent round), or go with your suggestion. Mark. Alastair Green wrote: > > Mark Little wrote: >> >> WS-AT, currently: >> >> "The protocol faults defined in this section are generated if the >> condition stated in the preamble is met. When used in a transaction >> protocol, these faults are targeted at a destination endpoint >> according to the protocol fault handling rules defined for that >> protocol. " >> >> Since we know that WS-AT is a transaction protocol, this text looks >> odd. I'd suggest: >> >> "The protocol faults defined in this section are generated if the >> condition stated in the preamble is met. These faults are targeted at >> a destination endpoint according to the fault handling rules defined >> for that protocol. " > But "that protocol" is this protocol! I think this is a mechanical > transposition from WS-C. AT needs to say: > > "These faults are formulated as terminal notification messages in > accordance with the rules laid out in Section 9, 'Use of WS-Addressing > Headers'." > > Alastair > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]