ws-tx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-tx] - Re: Groups - New Action Item #0058 Review use of RFC 2119keywords ...
- From: Thomas Freund <tjfreund@us.ibm.com>
- To: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:15:50 -0600
Monica,
Wouldn't it be more precise to say ...
The participant SHOULD complete application processing and SHOULD transmit the Completed notification.
Regards
Tom
"Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
"Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Sent by: Monica.Martin@Sun.COM
10/31/2006 07:25 PM
|
|
>...3. Change "should" to "SHOULD", lines ...353,...
>
mm1: Tom, have you considered rewriting this sentence to be more
consistent with other similar sentence structures, and improve
understanding of the requirement:
Change from:
352 Upon receipt of this notification the participant knows that it will
receive no new requests for work
353 within the business activity. It should complete application
processing and transmit the
354 Completed notification.
Change to:
352 Upon receipt of this notification the participant knows that it will
receive no new requests for work
353 within the business activity. The participant completes application
processing and SHOULD transmit the
354 Completed notification.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]