Re: [ws-tx] NEW Issue (Errata): Update WS-Policy reference description

[Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>]

http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/SUBM-WS-Policy-20060425/
uses the namespace
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy/

Thats why it amounts to the same thing
(and I mean *exactly* the same thing).

Regards,
Ian Robinson

"Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Sent by: Monica.Martin@Sun.COM

27/04/2007 16:00

To	Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB
cc	Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "'Ram Jeyaraman'" <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>, ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject	Re: [ws-tx] NEW Issue (Errata): Update WS-Policy reference description

>Ian Robinson wrote: Monica - do you mean that it would be better to
reference WS-Policy 1.2 via the W3C submission rather than the namespace
i.e use:
>[WSPOLICY] Web Services Policy 1.2 ? Framework (WS-Policy), 
>http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/SUBM-WS-Policy-20060425/, W3C Member
>Submission, 25 April 2006.
>
>rather than the suggested:
>[WSPOLICY] Web Services Policy Framework (WS-Policy), 
>http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy, VeriSign, Microsoft,
Sonic 
>Software, IBM, BEA Systems, SAP, March 2006. 
>?
>
>I agree these amount to the same thing.
>
>Regards,
>Ian Robinson
>
mm1: Yes, they both technically provide the same requirements as there
were changes such as in the policy element (from 2004/09).  The Member
Submission is also consistent with what WS-RX (WS-Reliable Messaging 
Policy) and WS-SX (WS-Security Policy) have referenced. The difference
is the actual namespace change. Thanks.

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature