[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: No Subject
"there is a special shortcut for the invoke activity to inline a = compensation handler rather than explicitly using an immediately = enclosing scope". Ugo > -----Original Message----- > From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@intalio.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:13 PM > To: Ugo Corda > Cc: edwink@collaxa.com; Satish Thatte; Yuzo Fujishima; > wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Implicit <sequence> macro >=20 >=20 > Ugo Corda wrote: >=20 > >I agree. If we decide that sequence shortcuts are not good,=20 > then we should be consistent throughout the spec and=20 > eliminate existing shortcuts. Or we should provide a=20 > rationale for why existing shortcuts like compensation are=20 > the only good ones. > > > >Ugo > > =20 > > > Where is the shortcut in compensation? >=20 > arkin >=20 >=20 >=20
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]