Issue - 74 - ignore or forbid the unneeded joinCondition

["Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de>]

For the implicite part, it is clear,  that no joinCondition needs implicitely be asumed by the engine, but what to do with a activity, which is not the target of a link, but has a join condition. This can mean:

 

a) this is forbidden and will trigger an error on static check

b) can be ignored

 

Personally I vote for declaring it illegal, while deploying it.

 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Bernd Eckenfels
Chief Architect
--
SEEBURGER AG - Edisonstr.1 , D-75015 Bretten, Germany
Fax: +49 (0)7252 96-2400 - Phone: +49 (0)7252 96-1256
mailto:b.eckenfels@seeburger.de - http://www.seeburger.de

-----Original Message-----
From: ws-bpel issues list editor [mailto:peter.furniss@choreology.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:59 PM
To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsbpel] Issue - 74 - Ambiguity in join condition definition

This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list. The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent document with the title in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.

Issue - 74 - Ambiguity in join condition definition

Status: open
Date added: 9 Oct 2003
Submitter: Dieter Roller
Date submitted: 09 October 2003
Description: The specs could possibly be interpreted in such a way that activities without an incoming link could also have a join condition. This is not the intended meaning.
Submitter's proposal: Modify the first sentence in the second paragraph in section 12.5.1 as follows :

Every activity that is the target of a link has an implicit or explicit joinCondition attribute associated with it; an activity that is not target of a link has no joinCondition attribute associated with it.

Furthermore it may be helpful to have a similar sentence earlier in the document.
Changes: 9 Oct 2003 - new issue

---

To comment on this issue, please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 74 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message.

To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.