[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue - 2- Why I think we should close Issue 2
Over the last two months I have made a series of proposals for how to introduce sub-functions to BPEL: * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200310/msg00355.html * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200310/msg00366.html * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200310/msg00367.html * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200310/msg00368.html * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200311/msg00021.html * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200311/msg00023.html Having spent this time living with these proposals I have come to the conclusion that it will take us a significant amount of time to get everything right and ready for implementers to implement. My personal belief is that customers will benefit more by getting the BPEL spec out as early as possible than by having sub-functions in the first version of BPEL. Sub-functions are something that we can safely add in later as an extension and I would certainly expect them to be part of the next version of BPEL. Therefore I propose that we close Issue 2 with a note that the matter should be considered by those working on future versions of BPEL. Yaron
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]