[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 95 - Proposal to Vote
Hi DK, Do you think it may be a better idea to rename <throw/> to <rethrow/>? Since <throw/> or <rethrow/> can only happens within <catchAll>, it would be easier for BPEL users to distinguish the difference syntactially, if it is named as <rethrow/>. And, it would be easier for XML Schema of BPEL to enforce that semantics without relying on after-schema-validation semantics check of BPEL translator/compiler/processor implementation. (This idea came from one of my co-workers: Viru Singh.) Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu Dieter Koenig1 wrote: >Proposed resolution for Issue 95: Allow all custom fault handlers >rethrowing the original fault. > >Rationale: Default fault handlers, in addition to other steps, rethrow the >original fault. Custom fault handlers must be able to express the default >behavior as well. > >Proposed syntax: > <throw/> >(without attributes). > >Example: > <catchAll> > <sequence> > ... > <throw/> <!-- this is a rethrow of the original fault --> > </sequence> > <catchAll> > >Kind Regards >DK > > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]