[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 99 - Proposal to vote
Why don't we allow abstract activities to either start with a normal, legal start activity and/or an <opaque> activity? The meaning of using <opaque> as a start activity in the context of an abstract process is 'unspecified stuff happens first..." By explicitly including an <opaque> activity we make it clear that it was the intention of the author of the abstract activity to not specify how the process starts. Thanks, Yaron Trickovic, Ivana wrote: > Proposed resolution for issue 99: Any basic activity, except activities <reply> > and <terminate>, may appear at the beginning of a BPEL abstract process. > > The proposed resolution does not affect the BPEL Schema (no changes are needed). > Clarifications should be included in sections 6.4 and 11.4. > > Please note that the <terminate> activity is limited to executable processes, > and a <reply> activity must always be preceded by a <receive> activity. > Therefore these two activities are explicitly excluded. > > > Kind regards, > > Ivana > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the > OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]