Fw: Agenda for April 14 TC call - update

[Diane Jordan <drj@us.ibm.com>]

When I sent the agenda, I forgot to
include discussion of issue 34 and related issues 15, 71, 86, 87.  These
were not completely covered at the face to face due to time constraints.


Here are action items I recorded at
face to face meeting: 
-Issue 75: Yaron to start email on how
to handle
-Issue 83: Yaron will flesh out a proposal
with Alex and Bernd and circulate by email
-Issue 94:  Alex will make a proposal
for  resolution 
-Issue 108: Dieter R. will send a proposal
to vote working with Yaron
-Issue 101:  Danny will send a
proposal for resolution
-Issue 11: Martin will provide an alternative
proposal.  At next TC call we will review Danny’s proposal, Martin’s
and pro/con of leaving as is and then do Kavi vote.  Results of straw
poll: Danny’s proposal: 10 no, 9 yes.  Leave as is: 17 yes.  Unhappy
with assign as it is today 8
-Issue 100: will be included in Martin’s
alternative
-Issue 53-59:  Satish to open issue
to replace content of appendix c 
-Issue 90: Diane to ask Kristopher for
proposal to vote for consideration at next call.   
-Issue 103: needs to be solved before
102.  Alex will provide proposal to vote.
-Issue 4:  Ivana will continue
to work on proposal.  Proposal for 103 will effect this – it will
be worked in parallel 
-Issues to be voted at next TC call
with recommendation from f2f:
.Issue 25: remove instance compensation
handlers and the enableInstanceCompensation attribute.  General consensus
.Issue 30, 53-59: Choreology proposal
strawpoll 27 yes, 1 no
.Issue  48: close with no action.
 16 yes, 2 no, 2 abstain
.Issue 33: accept Bernd’s proposal
to resolve by clarifying the wording in the spec.  He will send an
updated version for the formal vote.   24 yes (unanimous among attendees),
1 abstention due to phone line noise 
.Issue 37:  Accept part one as
proposed by Yuzo 13 yes, 0 no.  (I seem to have missed the action
for the rest of 37 - Yuzo can probably provide this)
-Investigate how to vote in non-quorate
face to face meetings possibly using kavi or formally recording results
and doing “delta” vote at next call. 
Let us know if any are missing/incorrect.
 John and I are working on consolidating the minutes - apologies for
the delay which is due to my vacation, not the scribes.   

Regards, Diane
IBM  Dynamic e-business Technologies
drj@us.ibm.com
(919)254-7221 or 8-444-7221, Mobile: 919-624-5123

----- Forwarded by Diane
Jordan/Raleigh/IBM on 04/12/2004 11:10 PM -----

Diane Jordan/Raleigh/IBM

04/12/2004 01:22 AM

To	ws bpel tc <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	Agenda for April 14 TC call

The next call of the WS BPEL TC will
be on Wed. April 14 at 8 am Pacific.   Dial in info is: USA Toll Free
Number: 888-711-4576 USA Toll Number: +1-484-630-9377,  LEADER: MS
DIANE JORDAN PASSCODE: WS BPEL TECHNICAL COMMITTEE.   The passcode
and the leader's name will be required to join the call.  
Here is the proposed agenda: 

- Roll call/determine quorum 
- Review/accept minutes from  Mar. 3, Mar. 17 conference calls and
Mar. 31 -  Apr. 1 face to face meeting.   
- Nomination/volunteers to take minutes for this call.  
- Review agenda
- Discussion of face to face meeting
results. 
- Liaison subgroup report .  
- Use case subgroup report . 
- Requirements and Issues Coordination subgroup report.    
- Specification Editing subgroup report.   
- Implementation subgroup report. 
- Issue discussion   
At the face to face, a number of issues
were discussed.  As there was no quorum, we were unable to finalize
resolutions but held straw polls.  It was requested that they be brought
to vote at the next quorate call with the recommendation that the results
of the face to face be accepted.  The following are the issues/polls:
  
–        Issue
25: remove instance compensation handlers and the enableInstanceCompensation
attribute.  General consensus
–        Issue
30, 53-59: Accept Choreology proposal:  strawpoll 27 yes, 1 no
–        Issue
 48: close with no action.  16 yes, 2 no, 2 abstain
–        Issue
33: accept Bernd’s proposal to resolve by clarifying the wording in the
spec.  He will send an updated version for the formal vote.  
24 yes (unanimous among attendees), 1 abstention due to phone line noise

-          
   Issue 37:  Accept part one as proposed by Yuzo 13 yes,
0 no.  
Issues 91,
97, 99 with proposals to vote, and the related issues107, 82 and 109 were
not discussed at the face to face due to time constraints.    
 
Issue 94 has a proposal to vote which came
out of the discussion at the face to face. 
- New business

 Regards, 
Diane  and John