Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 142 - Break & Continue

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

>Koening: Besides the point about becoming a programming language raised in a
>different issue, I think we are now entering the space of GOTO-programming
>with this issue.
>
>Even if both points were acceptable, is there any proposal about what this
>would look like if such loops with breaks also contain parallel constructs?
>As an example, who can tell me what the following <break> would do to
><sequence1>?
>
><while>
>   <flow>
>      <sequence1>
>         ...
>      <sequence1>
>      <sequence2>
>         <break>
>      </sequence2>
>   </flow>
></while>
>
>I expect there to be many other hard-to-explain scenarios, e.g. with
>handlers. Am I missing something?
>  
>
mm1: Dieter, doesn't this relate in some way to Issue 5, Suspend and 
Resume we closed with no change?