RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 147.4 - Proposal For Vote

["Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de>]

Hello,

How about "<iterate>" for the sequential forEach? 

I dont like the new ComplexCamelStyle names we are inventing recently,
the original bpel tags have been so clean and clear and often used in
presentations therefore.

Not sure about the parallel, maybe "<parallel>" or Ivana proposed once
<bundle>? Maybe <fork> or <branch>? Or simply <forEach> (however the
later may be confusing since forEach is usually the operator for vistor
pattern on iterations.

Gruss
Bernd


-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Yiu [mailto:alex.yiu@oracle.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 9:56 AM
To: ygoland@bea.com
Cc: wsbpeltc; Alex Yiu
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 147.4 - Proposal For Vote


I would prefer having two activities: <forEach> and <parallelForEach> It
help stress the difference of these two behavior. (Similar to <sequence>
vs <flow>).

I hope it would not create a big change in your proposal text.

Thanks!

Regards,
Alex Yiu


Yaron Y. Goland wrote:

> I propose we have a single activity called foreach with an attribute 
> that indicates if it has serial or parallel semantics.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in

> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php