subject lines and issues list (was RE: [wsbpel] Issue 229 - Proposal for vote)

["Peter Furniss" <peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

Please don't send messages with a Subject line that leaves you as
	Issue xyz - Propos...

because my scripts perceive that to be a new proposal and I have to
intervene
stop them changing the status. Not a big deal, just a convenience.

The Re: in a follow-up messages prevents this. And the scripts ignore
all the [wsbpel]
etc.

Peter


> -----Original Message-----
> From: aalves@bea.com [mailto:aalves@bea.com] 
> Sent: 05 January 2006 17:29
> To: alex.yiu@oracle.com
> Cc: arkin@intalio.com; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; 
> chris.keller@active-endpoints.com
> Subject: [wsbpel] Issue 229 - Proposal for vote
> 
> 
> Hi,  
> 
> This is a minor observation, but I don't find it that 
> confusing to differentiate between <compensate/> and 
> <compensate scope="X"/>.   
> 
> I actually think it makes sense to have the same Xml element 
> relate to both forms of compensation, as, after-all, both do 
> deal with compensation of their inner scopes, the latter 
> selectively.  
> 
> Compensation is a tricky feature to explain nonetheless, it 
> seems to me that having a more descriptive name won't help 
> that much, hence I am in favor of keeping the simplicity of 
> the single compensate name.  
> 
> For example, we don't have a <receiveInOnly/>, 
> <receiveInOut/> instead of just <receive/>. Also 
> <compensateInner/> seems to indicate that there is a 
> <compensateOuter/>.  
> 
> Anyway, just my opinion, either way we go is fine with me.  
> 
> Sincerely, 
>