Re: [wsrf] Re: [wsn] WS-Addressing submitted to W3C as input

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Which one? There are now three versions of WS-Addressing.
Pl. note that the latest version has a new concept of 'Reference 
parameters' which is very similar to 'Reference properties' except when 
it comes to comparing EPRs.

-Anish
--

Steve Graham wrote:

> 
> David:
> Good question. I would recommend that we continue with the IRP 
> clarification, but build only WS-Addressing embodiments.
> 
> sgg
> 
> ++++++++
> Steve Graham
> (919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
> STSM, On Demand Architecture
> Member, IBM Academy of Technology
> <Soli Deo Gloria/>
> ++++++++
> 
> 
> David Hull <dmh@tibco.com> wrote on 08/10/2004 03:42:25 PM:
> 
>  > How does this relate to the assertion that the IRP is too tightly 
> bound up with its
>  > WS-Addressing embodiment?
>  >
>  > Steve Graham wrote:
>  >
>  > Folks:
>  > Please see: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/05/.
>  > This is a submission request to the W3C by BEA, IBM, Microsoft, SAP 
> and Sun to
>  > submit WS-Addressing to W3C as input to the standardization process.
>  >
>  > I would like to recommend that we consider using WS-Addressing as 
> submitted to the
>  > W3C in our work in WS-RF and WS-N.  Note, our use of WSDL 1.1 (which 
> was a
>  > submission to W3C, just like WS-Addressing is now) is a precedence 
> for this sort of
>  > pre-requisite.
>  >
>  > I formally move that we use WS-Addressing as our only means of 
> reference mechanism.
>  > In particular, I propose that we avoid abstracting the reference 
> mechanism, such as
>  > BPEL has done, in light of this submission of WS-Addressing to W3C. 
>  Note, this
>  > minimizes the perturbation to the currently specified message 
> exchanges, and
>  > reduces migration impediments for implementations that are building 
> to the 1.1 and
>  > 1.2 versions of our specifications.
>  >
>  > sgg
>  >
>  > ++++++++
>  > Steve Graham
>  > (919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
>  > STSM, On Demand Architecture
>  > Member, IBM Academy of Technology
>  > <Soli Deo Gloria/>
>  > ++++++++