Re: [wsrf] Re: [wsn] WS-Addressing submitted to W3C as input

[Steve Graham <sggraham@us.ibm.com>]

Which one is a good question.  We
either resolve Issue WSRF43 and move to WS-Addressing version submitted
to W3C (my recommendation). In doing this task, we could consider what
(if any) role reference parameters plays.

sgg
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++


Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
wrote on 08/12/2004 03:52:59 AM:

> Which one? There are now three versions of WS-Addressing.
> Pl. note that the latest version has a new concept of 'Reference 
> parameters' which is very similar to 'Reference properties' except
when 
> it comes to comparing EPRs.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> Steve Graham wrote:
> 
> > 
> > David:
> > Good question. I would recommend that we continue with the IRP
> > clarification, but build only WS-Addressing embodiments.
> > 
> > sgg
> > 
> > ++++++++
> > Steve Graham
> > (919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
> > STSM, On Demand Architecture
> > Member, IBM Academy of Technology
> > <Soli Deo Gloria/>
> > ++++++++
> > 
> > 
> > David Hull <dmh@tibco.com> wrote on 08/10/2004 03:42:25
PM:
> > 
> >  > How does this relate to the assertion that the IRP
is too tightly 
> > bound up with its
> >  > WS-Addressing embodiment?
> >  >
> >  > Steve Graham wrote:
> >  >
> >  > Folks:
> >  > Please see: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/05/.
> >  > This is a submission request to the W3C by BEA, IBM,
Microsoft, SAP 
> > and Sun to
> >  > submit WS-Addressing to W3C as input to the standardization
process.
> >  >
> >  > I would like to recommend that we consider using WS-Addressing
as 
> > submitted to the
> >  > W3C in our work in WS-RF and WS-N.  Note, our
use of WSDL 1.1 (which 
> > was a
> >  > submission to W3C, just like WS-Addressing is now)
is a precedence 
> > for this sort of
> >  > pre-requisite.
> >  >
> >  > I formally move that we use WS-Addressing as our only
means of 
> > reference mechanism.
> >  > In particular, I propose that we avoid abstracting
the reference 
> > mechanism, such as
> >  > BPEL has done, in light of this submission of WS-Addressing
to W3C. 
> >  Note, this
> >  > minimizes the perturbation to the currently specified
message 
> > exchanges, and
> >  > reduces migration impediments for implementations
that are building 
> > to the 1.1 and
> >  > 1.2 versions of our specifications.
> >  >
> >  > sgg
> >  >
> >  > ++++++++
> >  > Steve Graham
> >  > (919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
> >  > STSM, On Demand Architecture
> >  > Member, IBM Academy of Technology
> >  > <Soli Deo Gloria/>
> >  > ++++++++