wsn message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsn] [WSN5.2]Documenting pseudo schema language
- From: Steve Graham <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
- To: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:25:55 -0400
Not in any near term I would imagine.
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++
David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
09/09/2004 03:55 PM
|
To
|
|
cc
| wsn@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Subject
| Re: [wsn] [WSN5.2]Documenting
pseudo schema language |
|
Is there any chance of some entity documenting a standard
form for this, a la EBNF?
Steve Graham wrote:
I move that we resolve this issue by adopting the text similar to that
used in WSDL 2.0 (part 1) [1]:
Pseudo-schemas are provided for each component, before the description
of the component. They use BNF-style conventions for attributes and elements:
`?' denotes optionality (i.e. zero or one occurrences), `*'
denotes zero or more occurrences, `+' one or more occurrences, `['
and `]' are used to form groups, `|' represents choice. Attributes
are conventionally assigned a value which corresponds to their type, as
defined in the normative schema.
<!-- sample pseudo-schema -->
<defined_element
required_attribute_of_type_string="xs:string"
optional_attribute_of_type_int="xs:int"?
>
<required_element />
<optional_element />?
<one_or_more_of_these_elements />+
[ <choice_1 /> | <choice_2 /> ]*
</defined_element>
[1]http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]