[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsn] Proposed Issue Text: Should UseNotify be a policy utterance?
After a reread I think my -1 was not clearly expressed. If we continue to specify default behavior, wrt the Notify message, in the absence of 'UseNotify' then I think this would be an appropriate factorization. I believe that moving a flag for 'raw' message to the policy section (perhaps 'DoNotUseNotify') would be ok, the implication being that default behavior is normatively described. Tom Tom Maguire/Hawthorne/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 04/14/2005 05:16:18 PM: > > > > > -1 > > One of the premises of the WS-N set of specifications is to provide a set > of protocols and wire formats for Web Services. Removing the default of > 'true' for the UseNotify flag and relegating it to a policy utterance seems > contrary to the aforementioned premise. > > Tom > > Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when > there is nothing left to take away. – Antoine de Saint-Exupery > > > T o m M a g u i r e > > > STSM, On Demand Architecture > > > Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 > > > > David Hull > <dmh@tibco.com> > To > 04/14/2005 03:40 wsn@lists.oasis-open.org > PM cc > > Subject > [wsn] Proposed Issue Text: Should > UseNotify be a policy utterance? > > > > > > > > > > > WSN2.XX: Should UseNotify be a policy utterance? > > The SubscribeRequest message currently contains a specialized <UseNotify> > element indicating whether the producer should use the Notify message > format described in section 3.1. The Notify message is essentially a > convenience and is not fundamental to the basic Subscribe/Notify pattern. > If it were not already in the base specification, it could clearly be added > via policy. As such, it should be treated as a pre-defined policy rather > than a built-in feature of notification, just as topic, selector and > precondition are now treated as pre-defined filters. > Making this change would bring WSN more closely in line with WSE and would > also strengthen the extensibility story concerning policy. > Specifications > WS-BaseNotification > Proposed Recommendations > Remove the <UseNotify> property from the SubscribeRequest message > proper and make it an optional child of the <SubscriptionPolicy> > element (and so the first complete entry in the policy document(s)). > The element would retain its current semantics. > Notes > Status: > Contact: > David Hull, Steve Graham > Cross Reference: Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. – Antoine de Saint-Exupery T o m M a g u i r e STSM, On Demand Architecture Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]