Re: [wsrf] Issue: ResourcePropertyValueChangeNotification is not clearabout the contents of Oldvalue and NewValue

[Tom Maguire <tmaguire@us.ibm.com>]

+1  I believe this was the original intent; as you pointed out just poorly
worded.

Tom


"Murray, Bryan P." <bryan.murray@hp.com> wrote on 08/22/2004 05:57:43 PM:

> The text talking about the ResourcePropertyValueChangeNotification in
> WS-ResourceProperties indicates that the contents of the OldValue and
> NewValue elements "contain the value of the affected WS-Resource
> property".
>
> This definition may make sense when the maxOccurs for the proeprty is 1,
> but it is not clear what the form of the notification message should be
> if the value of maxOccurs for the property is greater than one. In this
> case it does not make sense for the Old/NewValue elements to contain
> just the value of the proeprty, but indicates we should include the
> entire property element for as many occurances of the element that exist
> at the time of the notification.
>
>
> I propose that the elements be renamed so the word "Value" is not
> included in the name. Maybe soemthing like OldProeprty and NewProperty
> could be used instead. Also, the text should be updated to indicate that
> the entire property element with its contents is to be included as
> children of the Old... And New... Elements, where there will be as many
> children of these elemetns as there are occurrances of the resource
> property in the resource property document.
>
> Bryan