RE: [wsrf] Should we collapse WSRF schema documents?

["Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Vambenepe, William N [mailto:vbp@hp.com] 
>Sent: Thursday, Nov 18, 2004 9:36 AM
>To: Ian Robinson; wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [wsrf] Should we collapse WSRF schema documents?
>
>
>
>Hi Ian,
>
>Sorry I wasn't on the call on Monday but the resolution for issue 50
>that you list below looks reasonable to me. On the other hand, your
>suggestion to merge all schemas from all WSRF specs really 
>worries me if
>I understand what you are proposing. Would this mean that if I want to
>implement for example only WS-RP I would be provided a schema that
>includes a lot of extra elements that I don't understand (from WS-RL,
>WS-SG...) and I should ignore them? If this is the case, I am a big -1
>to this. There are very good reasons for splitting WSRF in multiple
>specs and that split includes a schema doc for each spec.

+1. 

>
>William

--umit