RE: [wsrf] Should we collapse WSRF schema documents?

["Sedukhin, Igor S" <Igor.Sedukhin@ca.com>]

-1: do not collapse schemas 


-- Igor Sedukhin .. (igor.sedukhin@ca.com)
-- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11749 


-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Robinson [mailto:ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 7:36 AM
To: wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsrf] Should we collapse WSRF schema documents?





Related to issues 50 ("WSRF50: Faults common to multiple specs in one
namespace ") and 81 ("WSRF81: recommendation to change WSDL documents"),
I would like to suggest that we collapse the schema for RP, RL, SG and
BF into a single document that can be imported into each WSDL.

On the telecon this week, we resolved issue 50: "WSRF50: Faults common
to multiple specs in one namespace "
with a recommendation to move the definition of the 'ResourceUnknown'
fault from WSRF-RP to the WS-Resource spec. A new schema document,
referenced from the WS-Resource specification, would be needed to
contain the type definition of this fault. This fault may be returned by
a WS-Resource following any message exchange, not just those protocol
messages defined in the WSRF specs.

Rather than create a new schema document, we could consider refactoring
our existing ones by collapsing the RP, RL, SG and BF schema into a
single WSRF schema document.

Any opinions?

Ian