Re: [wsrf] Interop suggestions

[Tim Banks <tim_banks@uk.ibm.com>]

Hi Rick, Thanks for these suggestions.

1) +1  -  That's a good idea: having a fresh printer would avoid any mess
left over by a previous test.  I propose adding a new portType to the
existing WSDL.

2) +1 -  My mistake. Also, there is a response to Send_Document and it will
be clearer if it is documented in the same way as the other exchanges.


We haven't discussed (among the TC/interop participants ) a process for
updating the Interop scenarios. Shall we do it via the Issues list? One
constraint I can see is that Interop issues may need to be dealt with
quickly.

Regards, Tim Banks


rineholt@us.ibm.com wrote on 17/01/2005 16:41:23:

> I'd like to propose the following changes to the WSRF Interop:
>
> 1) Provide a standard means for each participant to obtain a unique
> "fresh" printer resource to test against
>   Each participant provide a URL to a printer factory type web
> service with the following request/response format
>
>     request:
>       <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>       <wsrf-pr:createPrinter/>
>       </SOAP-ENV:Body>
>
>     reply:
>       <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>         <wsrf-pr:createPrinterResponse>
>            <wsrf-pr:printerEPR>
>            <!-- epr content goes here -->
>           </wsrf-pr:printerEPR>
>         </wsrf-pr:createPrinterResponse>
>       </SOAP-ENV:Body>
>
> 2) The non WSRF operations follow the wsrf pattern of a single
> document in the SOAP body
>    Specifically,  section 3.1 Print_Job, request and response  as a
> suggestion:
> <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>    <wsrf-pr:Print_Job>
>      <wsrf-pr:job_name>My First Printer Job</wsrf-pr:job_name>
>      <wsrf-pr:document_format>text/plain</wsrf-pr:document_format>
>      <wsrf-pr:Base64Data>SGVsbG8gV29ybGQh</wsrf-pr:Base64Data>
>    </wsrf-pr:Print_Job>
> </SOAP-ENV:Body>
>
> <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>   <wsrf-pr:Print_JobResponse>
>    <wsrf-pr:SuccessStatusCode>successful-ok</wsrf-pr:SuccessStatusCode>
>      <wsrf-pr:job_reference>
>           <wsa:Address>
>            http://www.WSRF-Examples.org/IPPprinters/Jobs
>           </wsa:Address>
>           <wsa:ReferenceProperties>
>             <job_id>1</job_id>
>           </wsa:ReferenceProperties>
>           <wsa:PortType>wsrf-prw:Job</wsa:PortType>
>      </wsrf-pr:job_reference>
>      <wsrf-pr:job_state>pending</wsrf-pr:job_state>
>   </wsrf-pr:Print_JobResponse>
> </SOAP-ENV:Body>
>
> ... and Same for Send_Document
>  <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>   <wsrf-pr:Send_Document>
>     <wsrf-pr:last_document>true</wsrf-pr:last_document>
>     <wsrf-pr:document_format>text/plain</wsrf-pr:document_format>
>     <wsrf-pr:Base64Data>
>       Q29uZ3JhdHVsYXRpb25zLCB5b3UndmUgcmVh
>       Y2hlZCB0aGUgZW5kIG9mIHRoZSBTY2VuYXJpbyE=
>     </wsrf-pr:Base64Data>
>   </wsrf-pr:Send_Document>
>  </SOAP-ENV:Body>
>
>  Should we have the response for Send_Document ?  Or should it be oneway?