wsrf message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrf] Potential NEW ISSUE: Clarify authoritative precedence earlier (Terminology)
- From: Steve Graham <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
- To: Tom Maguire <tmaguire@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:59:37 -0400
+1
++++++++
Steve Graham
(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
STSM, IBM Software Group, Web services and SOA
Member, IBM Academy of Technology
<Soli Deo Gloria/>
++++++++
Tom Maguire/Hawthorne/IBM@IBMUS
04/19/2005 10:50 AM
|
To
| wsrf@lists.oasis-open.org
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [wsrf] Potential NEW ISSUE:
Clarify authoritative precedence earlier (Terminology) |
|
WSRF-96 clarified the authoritative precedence of fragments of the
specification wrt XML schema and WSDL descriptions.
The statement that was added to the specifications is:
The XML types and elements used in this specification are included
here
for convenience. The
authoritative version of this schema document is available at:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrf/2005/03/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This statement first occurs in Appendix B of the specs and then again in
Appendix C. This is somewhat late for
the introduction of this concept. Further this statement does not
speak to
the precedence of normative text wrt
XML schema and WSDL descriptions. I suggest that we add a precedence
statement to section 1.2
'Terminology' that clarifies the precedence.
The normative text in this specification takes precedence over
XML
Schema and WSDL descriptions. The XML
schema and WSDL descriptions take precedence over "pseudo-schema"
(defined in Section 1.2). Examples
are not normative.
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when
there is nothing left to take away. – Antoine de Saint-Exupery
T o m M a g u i r e
STSM, On Demand Architecture
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]