[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Proposal to resolve PR26 - Soap Fault with rm-fault
Proposal to Resolve Issue PR26 – Soap Fault with RM-Fault The behaviour that an RM-Fault is returned with a soap fault in the case that a response payload is not available for response reply pattern was part of the public review draft cd .992. The changes suggested by Sunil would constitute a substantive change to the public review draft. This behaviour works, and provides fault information separately tarteted for the rmp and the producer. However the following sentences were inadvertently removed during editing after CD .992 “ If the RM-Fault encountered was due to a problem with the request header element, a SOAP client fault MUST be returned. If the RM Fault encountered was due to a problem with processing by the receiving RMP (including the inability to return a response due to Duplicate Elimination), a soap:server fault must be returned. “ We agreed to have section 4.5 only talk about rm faults, so the parenthetical statement should be removed. Proposed Resolution: Add the following paragraph in Line 1070 of 1.04JacquesContrib, after the first sentence of the bullet: “ If the RM-Fault encountered was due to a problem with the request header element, a SOAP client fault MUST be returned. If the RM Fault encountered was due to a problem with processing by the receiving RMP, a soap:server fault must be returned. “ Tom Rutt -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]