[wsrp] [errata #30] Where does the xsi:type attribute go on extensions?

[Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>]

Comment: #30. 6/20/03 (Interoperability
SC) 
The conformance statement regarding the
type specification for extensions is too vague for proper interoperability.
Suggest explicitly requiring the extension element’s child to carry the
xsi:type attribute. This makes the use of the xsi:type attribute consistent
with its definition without requiring everyone to redefine the extension
element as a choice of their set of extensions. 

Document: Spec
Section: 5.5.1
Old Text: Each
such extension MUST declare its type using the schema-defined “type”
attribute
New Text: Each
such extension element carries a single child element which MUST declare
its type using the schema-defined “type” attribute