Re: InvalidParameters fault? )

[Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>]

In my previous, I missed the name of the fault. It should read

 > Page 22, line 40 refers to an InvalidParameters
 >  fault. There is no such fault in the protocol.

Regards,

Subbu

Subbu Allamaraju said the following on 03/05/2004 01:13 PM:
> 
> I came across an error in the spec. This is possibly a remnant from 
> older drafts of the spec.
> 
> Page 22, line 40 refers to an
>  fault. There is no such fault in the protocol.
> 
> The latest conformance spreadsheet (dated 01/26/2004) also refers to 
> this fault in statement CS022.
> 
> I guess we mean InconsistentParameters fault in both cases. If so, we 
> need an errata item for this in the spec, and an update to the 
> conformance spreadsheet.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Subbu
>