wsrp message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsrp] Markup with pbia and handleEvents
- From: Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>
- To: wsrp <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 11:23:10 -0400
This sentence was drafted as a clarification
of behavior intended in v1.
a. It only includes mode and windowState
because these are the only two components of the returned information where
the Consumer manages changes in value.
b. The statement is providing guidance
to the Portlet developer about what the Consumer will consider the markup
fragment to represent. A conformance statement in this area would be untestable.
Instead, we are saying the Consumer will consider the portlet to have provided
a particular type of markup fragment ... if the portlet actually supplied
something else, it is no different than an invocation of getMarkup returning
a fragment that ignores the supplied parameters.
c. Why shouldn't the Consumer be allowed
to cache the fragment as representing a particular state of the portlet
and then manage that cache entry the same as it would any other? The fact
that it is for a windowState and mode other than is what is currently showing
to the user doesn't make it invalid.
Rich
Subbu Allamaraju <subbu@bea.com>
07/03/05 07:06 PM
|
To
| wsrp <wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [wsrp] Markup with pbia and
handleEvents |
|
Sec 6.4.1 has a new sentence that reads as follows
"Also, the markup should be generated presuming that any requested
mode
or windowState changes are honored".
I've a few of questions on this wording.
a. Why not include other things like navigationalState, and
portletContext (implicit cloning) in this sentence?
b. To make interop work, why not make this a MUST? Without a strong
conformance requirement, the markup and what the consumer thinks of
portlet's state may be inconsistent. For instance, a Producer could
return markup in wsrp:view mode while asking for a mode change to
wsrp:edit. Assuming that the Consumer's honors the mode change, the
Consumer may end up showing wsrp:view mode's content for wsrp:edit mode.
c.Following (b), if a Consumer is unable to honor state changes, I think
that it MUST discard the markup returned by the Producer.
Comments?
Regards,
Subbu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]