wsrp message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Fw: [wsrp-comment] 10 User Information: P3P Names do not match JSR286 orP3P Names
- From: Rich Thompson <richt2@us.ibm.com>
- To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:02:47 -0400
I do not recall the reasons why we ended
up with the current syntax, but changing it would break compatibility with
v1.
Personally I am not seeing a good reason
to do that at this time.
Rich
----- Forwarded by Rich
Thompson/Watson/IBM on 09/20/2007 11:01 AM -----
Nathan E Lipke <nlipke@bea.com>
09/12/2007 01:00 PM
|
To
| wsrp-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [wsrp-comment] 10 User Information:
P3P Names do not match JSR286 or P3P Names |
|
The naming convention used in section 10 do not match
the names used in
either the P3P spec or JSR168/JSR286.
All of the other specs refer to P3P elements like:
* User.business-info.postal.name
However WSRP uses:
* businessInfo/postal/name
The differences are:
* Use '.' instead slash as a seperator
* Prefix or user.
* Use '-' instead of camel case for multi-word fields.
Nate
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries
and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary,
copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are
not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please
immediately return this by email and then delete it.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]