[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wss] namespace stability issue
Issue 31 re: the schema namespaces has been pending for months now. It was first raised by Time Moses in October. The status says that Karl Best is working on it and it should be resolved in "2 or 3 months". We ARE an OASIS TC attempting to produce an OASIS standard. I personally do not think we should produce schemas defined with namespaces that have nothing to do with OASIS **unless** OASIS TC Administration signs off on it. I am particularly against using a namespace that is owned by a specific company (i.e. According to whois, that is Microsoft in the case of xmlsoap.org). We agreed to defer this issue until after the interop draft, but I personally am opposed to dropping it for the committee specification draft. The OASIS TC Guidelines describe the allocation of a URN namespace for OASIS TC's. Some OASIS standards (SAML, XACML) use this URN format for the XML schema namespaces. Most of us, I think, feel that a resolvable URL-based namespace is preferable. Another OASIS TC (ebXML) uses such a resolvable URL namespace based at OASIS; namely http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-2_0.xsd. Note that we certainly could pick an oasis-based URL namespace as well. In our case, since we've asked Karl to help get this resolved, I feel that WSS should make an explicit statement to the OASIS TC Administrator indicating that the TC is going to use XML namespaces <list them> unless we hear an official objection from OASIS by <pick a date>. My preferences in order: 1. OASIS resolves the issue and provides us a resolvable URL namespace root. 2. We pick a resolvable URL based at OASIS ala ebXML (i.e. in our TC's URL namespace) I am opposed to using the schemas.xmlsoap.org based URL even as a last resort. Rob Philpott RSA Security Inc. The Most Trusted Name in e-Security Tel: 781-515-7115 Mobile: 617-510-0893 Fax: 781-515-7020 mailto:rphilpott@rsasecurity.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:38 AM > To: wss@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [wss] namespace stability issue > > I would like to confirm the expectation that the wsse and wsu namespaces > are now determined and stable, as follows: > > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/06/secext > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/06/utility > > Is it true that the namespaces in the document are not expected to change > any more, even when these become Oasis specifications? > > The question is a concern regarding stability of the namespaces for > development and interop. > > Is this correct? > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia Mobile Phones > > > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting > http://www.oasis- > open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]