[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue 99 edits
I have reviewed the changes to core-14 in response to Issue 99 and my only concern is that ValueType is still optional. I don't remember if the TC specifically agreed on this, but I am willing to go along with the majority. The reason for my concern is that as we have seen, different schemes may have different security properties. I would like to see the core spec say that Profiles which define more than one type will specify which one is the default value in the case that ValueType is not present. Hal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]