[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xacml-comment] IIB005's response is wrong?
Sorry, please ignore this comment. I was missing the detailed explanation in Appendix A.12, which says that: If the <AttributeDesignator> or <AttributeSelector> element were to evaluate to an empty bag, then the result of the expression SHALL be "False". Anyway, I believe that Section 7.3 should be more elaborated. At least, a referece to Appendix A.12 should be added. Also, Section 5.9, 5.13, and 5.17 (describing *Match) should have direct references to Appendix A.12 for the semantics of MatchId. Satoshi Hada IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory mailto:satoshih@jp.ibm.com Satoshi Hada/Japan/IBM@IB To: xacml-comment <xacml-comment@lists.oasis-open.org> MJP cc: Subject: [xacml-comment] IIB005's response is wrong? 2002/11/22 15:14 Why is the response "NotApplicable"? Section 7.3 says that: Its value SHALL be "Indeterminate" if any attribute value referenced in the target cannot be obtained. In this case, the attribute "urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:conformance-test:attribute:qos" is not in the request context. No attribute value cannot be obtained and so the result should be "Indeterminate". Please correct me if I'm wrong. Satoshi Hada IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory mailto:satoshih@jp.ibm.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC