RE: [xacml] legal values for Strings

["Daniel Engovatov" <dengovatov@bea.com>]

Yep.  That is most definitely a type error that we should not make.
<AttributeSelector> is not of data type ":string" 


-----Original Message-----
From: Seth Proctor [mailto:Seth.Proctor@Sun.COM] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 12:24 PM
To: Daniel Engovatov
Cc: xacml@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xacml] legal values for Strings


On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 14:40, Daniel Engovatov wrote:
> None of the XACML standard data types had to be represented as complex
> content, so that would definitely be an extension.   It seems to me
that
> your example is not valid (need to have all the proper &lt etc..) - is
> it?

Well, I'd like the example I gave to be invalid. This gets back to my
previous posting about AttributeAssignments. We have examples that look
like:

  <AttributeAssignment DataType="...:string" AttributeId="..."
    <AttributeSelector ...
  </AttributeAssignment>

As I read that, we're looking at an AttributeValue (the assignment) of
type string that contains complex content. Thus, my concern.


seth