[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: XACML 2.0 errata and 3.0
All, For the next 3.0 core draft I was planning to incorporate all the 2.0 errata. Most of it concerns the definition of some data types and functions copied from xpath/xquery. The copying was made to accommodate ITU since xpath/xquery was not approved at the time. Anne raised the issue earlier about going back to referring to the xpath/xquery, rather than copying text, now that they have been approved. What should I do it for the next 3.0 draft? Should I copy text like the current 2.0 errata, or should I refer to the approved version of xpath/xquery? What should I do for future 2.0 errata? Should I keep the copied text, or should we revert back to referring to xpath/xquery? Regards, Erik
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]