[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xcbf] Groups - XCBF XML Common Biometric Format CS April 3 2003.zipuploaded
Phil, I do NOT want this to be confrontational. Can we please have reasoned discussions on what will be a good Standard? The issues seem to revolve around BASE64, with perhaps a sub-issue of which parts use BASIC-XER and which use CXER, and the nature of examples. We need a consistent document. But that can only be achieved once we all agree on what is to be expressed. Are we abanonding BASE64 or not? Are we doing a contorted spec with CONTAINED BY, or a simple spec? Are we clearly using the formal notations to specify which bits are CXER and which are BASIC-XER (assuming that thre *are* any BASIC-XER - as opposed to CXER - components). And are the examples an tutorial text in-line with the normnative text? These are the main issues to be resolved - not by ballot, but by discussion. I am sure this is all solvable, but I would really prefer a solution by *discussion* within the TC to acheive a consensus, with futher ballots only occuring after there is such a consensus. Repeasted balllots that fail are certainly allowed by the procedures, but are not productive, and bring discredit on the work. John L Phillip H. Griffin wrote: > You may be correct! I'll check with Jamie on his interpretation of > the OASIS rules. > > Phil > > > Alessandro Triglia wrote: > >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: phil.griffin@asn-1.com [mailto:phil.griffin@asn-1.com] >>>Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 08:49 >>>To: xcbf@lists.oasis-open.org >>>Subject: [xcbf] Groups - XCBF XML Common Biometric Format CS >>>April 3 2003.zip uploaded >>> >>> >>>The document XCBF XML Common Biometric Format CS April 3 >>>2003.zip has been submitted by Phil Griffin >>>(phil.griffin@asn-1.com) to the XML Common Biometric Format >>>TC document repository. >>> >>>Document Description: >>>XCBF Committee Specification 1.0 approved March 25, 2003 >>>after agreed changes incorporated to address a thrity day >>>public review period, plus minor changes resulting >>> from comments made in that ballot that were accepted by the >>>XCBF TC in the ballot closing April 10, 2003. >>> >>> >> >> >>I understand that the present document has NOT been approved as a new >>Committee Specification, because the number of YES votes has been less >>than 2/3 of the total membership of the TC. Can you please clarify? >> >>Alessandro >> >> >> >> >>>Download Document: >>>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xcbf/download.php >>>/1501/XCBF%20XML%20Common%20Biometric%20Format%20CS%20April%20 >>>3%202003.zip >>> >>>View Document Details: >>>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xcbf/document.php >>> >>> >>?document_id=1501 >> >> >>PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email >>application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able >>to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your >>web browser. >> >>-OASIS Open Administration >> >> >> >> > -- PLEASE NOTE - As an anti-SPAM measure, e-mails will shortly not be accepted by my machine from an unknown sender unless the subject contains the phrase "Hi John". If you pass my e-mail address to others (which I am very happy for you to do) please tell them to include this phrase in the subject line of their first mailing to me. Thanks. Prof John Larmouth Larmouth T&PDS Ltd (Training and Protocol Development Services Ltd) 1 Blueberry Road Bowdon j.larmouth@salford.ac.uk Cheshire WA14 3LS (put "Hi John" in subject) England Tel: +44 161 928 1605 Fax: +44 161 928 8069
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]