[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xcbf] Groups - XCBF XML Common Biometric Format CS April 3 2003.zipuploaded
John, We're using Base64 in a simple specification. We are requiring CXER for encodings of values of type BiometricObjects when they must be cryptographically enhanced. We are not using formal notations to specify when CXER is required, because the specification requirements for all CXER use is so simple. Phil John Larmouth wrote: > Phil, > > I do NOT want this to be confrontational. > > Can we please have reasoned discussions on what will be a good Standard? > > The issues seem to revolve around BASE64, with perhaps a sub-issue of > which parts use BASIC-XER and which use CXER, and the nature of examples. > > We need a consistent document. But that can only be achieved once we > all agree on what is to be expressed. > > Are we abanonding BASE64 or not? Are we doing a contorted spec with > CONTAINED BY, or a simple spec? Are we clearly using the formal > notations to specify which bits are CXER and which are BASIC-XER > (assuming that thre *are* any BASIC-XER - as opposed to CXER - > components). And are the examples an tutorial text in-line with the > normnative text? > > These are the main issues to be resolved - not by ballot, but by > discussion. > > I am sure this is all solvable, but I would really prefer a solution > by *discussion* within the TC to acheive a consensus, with futher > ballots only occuring after there is such a consensus. > > Repeasted balllots that fail are certainly allowed by the procedures, > but are not productive, and bring discredit on the work. > > John L > > > Phillip H. Griffin wrote: > >> You may be correct! I'll check with Jamie on his interpretation of >> the OASIS rules. >> >> Phil >> >> >> Alessandro Triglia wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: phil.griffin@asn-1.com [mailto:phil.griffin@asn-1.com] Sent: >>>> Thursday, April 10, 2003 08:49 >>>> To: xcbf@lists.oasis-open.org >>>> Subject: [xcbf] Groups - XCBF XML Common Biometric Format CS April >>>> 3 2003.zip uploaded >>>> >>>> >>>> The document XCBF XML Common Biometric Format CS April 3 2003.zip >>>> has been submitted by Phil Griffin (phil.griffin@asn-1.com) to the >>>> XML Common Biometric Format TC document repository. >>>> >>>> Document Description: >>>> XCBF Committee Specification 1.0 approved March 25, 2003 after >>>> agreed changes incorporated to address a thrity day public review >>>> period, plus minor changes resulting from comments made in that >>>> ballot that were accepted by the XCBF TC in the ballot closing >>>> April 10, 2003. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I understand that the present document has NOT been approved as a new >>> Committee Specification, because the number of YES votes has been less >>> than 2/3 of the total membership of the TC. Can you please clarify? >>> >>> Alessandro >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Download Document: >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xcbf/download.php >>>> /1501/XCBF%20XML%20Common%20Biometric%20Format%20CS%20April%20 >>>> 3%202003.zip >>>> >>>> View Document Details: >>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xcbf/document.php >>>> >>> >>> ?document_id=1501 >>> >>> >>> PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email >>> application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able >>> to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of >>> your >>> web browser. >>> >>> -OASIS Open Administration >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]