Re: [xcbf] conference call outcome

["jmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com>]

I think we need to follow OASIS TC procedure as an OASIS TC. If the TC is willing to create a working group or subcommittee, that would be great but the informal creation of a group as you suggest without TC approval is outside of the OASIS procedures as I understand.

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: John Larmouth <j.larmouth@salford.ac.uk>
Reply-To: j.larmouth@salford.ac.uk
Date:  Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:28:15 +0000

>(Not sure whether Bancroft and Paul and Olivier are still on the XCBF list, so 
>copied to them just in case.)
>
>Rick,
>
>Sorry I missed the meeting - I am afraid I plain forgot.
>
>I *think* I understand what the CBEFF alignment ("profiling") means, thanks to a 
>  Chat with Alessandro.  Clearly this can be done if we think it worth-while: 
>that is, if Fernando will accept and back the end-result;  it is possible he is 
>using this as an excuse, and that further work will not advance the cause.
>
>If we are to proceed, we need to determine time-scales.  It is unlikely that we 
>can have anything done in time for the Sydney input deadline (I am up to my 
>eyebrows with CBEFF, BIoAPI, ASN.1 OID stuff, and BIP that will take me well 
>into the New Year, but could probably have a document available by the Sydney 
>meeting.
>
>I guess we need to caucus with Fernando at that meeting if we are to proceed?
>
>Can you handle NetMeeting?  I believe that a NetMeeting session with you, me and 
>and Alessandro (probably hosted by Paul Thorpe, because he is good at that!) and 
>possibly including Bancroft, who is good at deciding what is a good political 
>direction,  might be the best way to proceed.
>
>John L
>
>
>
>
>Randall Rick wrote:
>
>> hello all,
>> 
>> I apologize (again) to all for being an hour late to the conference
>> call.  I especially apologize to you, Dr. Larmouth.  :-)
>> 
>> Three of us joined the "hour late" version of the call just a few
>> minutes ago:  John Messing, Alessandro Triglia, and myself.  We did not
>> have a quorum, so no official actions could be taken.  However, the
>> informal consensus of the three of us on the call was that John Larmouth
>> should be empowered to proceed with developing the "profiled" version of
>> XCBF to bring XCBF into compliance with the current CD of the Augmented
>> CBEFF spec going through SC37.  (Perhaps we can formalize this with a
>> XCBF TC vote on the OASIS web site?)
>> 
>> 
>> Respectfully yours,
>> 
>>  ~ Rick Randall
>>    703-902-5388
>>    randall_rick@bah.com
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xcbf/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>-- 
>    Prof John Larmouth
>    Larmouth T&PDS Ltd
>    (Training and Protocol Development Services Ltd)
>    1 Blueberry Road
>    Bowdon                               j.larmouth@salford.ac.uk
>    Cheshire WA14 3LS
>    England
>    Tel: +44 161 928 1605		Fax: +44 161 928 8069
>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xcbf/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>