[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff-inline] XLIFF Inline Markup Subcommittee Teleconference - Dec-11-2012 - Summary
Hi Yves, All, I have committed the change to the PR. I fixed one more referral to existing target in the case of no existing target. I also added explicitly that it is ok to add translatable text. Regards, Fredrik Estreen > -----Original Message----- > From: xliff-inline@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff-inline@lists.oasis- > open.org] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel > Sent: den 11 december 2012 16:25 > To: xliff-inline@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xliff-inline] XLIFF Inline Markup Subcommittee Teleconference - > Dec-11-2012 - Summary > > XLIFF Inline Markup Subcommittee Teleconference - Dec-11-2012 - Summary > > Every second Tuesday of every month at 15:00 UTC 7:00am PT, 8:00am MT, > 10:00am ET 3:00pm London, 4:00pm Berlin > > Presents: Yves, Fredrik > > > > === Type attribute. > > Summary is here: > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-inline/201210/msg00013.html > > ACTION ITEM: yves to update spec to reflect the type/subtype change > -> done. > > Y: No further action required. > > > === Names. > > ACTION ITEM: Yves to post email for new names proposal. > -> done: first: > -> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-inline/201211/msg00005.ht > -> ml > then: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff- > inline/201212/msg00000.html > Notice is now in the draft. > > Y: No further action required in the SC. > > > === Draft. > > Latest draft is here: > https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/xliff/trunk/xliff- > 20/xliff-core.pdf > > Jung expressed concerns about some of the PR here: > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201212/msg00024.html > > Fredrik answered here: > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201212/msg00026.html > > Y: I think this discussion does not prevent us to submit the draft to the TC > where the discussion can continue and possible modifications can take place. > At this point there is no reasons to keep the current document at the SC > level. > F: agreed. > > Text change to address the first point of Jung old = "• User agents may leave > the existing target unchanged." > new = "• User agents may leave the segment without target." > > ACTION ITEM: Fredrik to change the specification. > > Preventing segmentation issue: > F: position initially based on thinking XLIFF as the processing format .. may > change. > Y: This is a topic for the TC. > > Y: Moves to put send the current draft (plus the changes above) as the final > proposal from the SC to the TC. > F: Second. > The motion passes unanimously. > > ACTION ITEM: Yves to make an informal ballot for all the group so they can > record their opinion. > The ballot is informative only. The motion has passed already. > > F: not sure if XLIFF doc are stand-alone or not (requires the schema or not?) > Y: think it's fine stand-alone > F: this is about the default values > Y: I see > F: schema provides the defaults > .. something for TC to discuss > > > === Any other business > > Y: This should be the last SC call. > .. thanks to Fredrik and all for the good work. > > > -end > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-inline-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-inline-help@lists.oasis-open.org >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]