Re: CFP and rendering

Thanks, Lucía

makes sense

I really wonder that we haven't been calling out CMS integrations

will put it prominently

and also will strive to normalize capitalization.

I am not aware of any literature on the rendering topic.

It's a brand new trend

According to Felix, MathML should have produced something WRT their browser rendering, others like us just started wondering that it would be good to have standardized rendering provisions..

Cheers

Dr. David Filip

===========

OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair

OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer

Spokes Research Fellow

ADAPT Centre

KDEG, Trinity College Dublin

Mobile: +420-777-218-122

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez <Lucia.Morado@unige.ch> wrote:

Hi David,

I have just reviewed the previous CFP, and I have two suggestions:

1) Under “Implementing XLIFF 2.x”, we could add one topic related to CMS, for example, something general as: CMS and XLIFF 2.x or XLIFF 2.x support in CMS

2) The capitalization needs to be normalized. See for example: Reference Implementations and Statements of Use for XLIFF 2.1 vs Experimental implementations of XLIFF 2.1

Another thing, at the end of the meeting, you mentioned some work being done on XLIFF rendering, do you have more details on that? Is there something already published that I can consult?

Best,

Lucía

xliff-promotion message