[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Re-ordering of inline codes
Hi David, Both a note and a PR to indicate the change MAY be made would be fine. -ys From: Dr. David Filip [mailto:David.Filip@ul.ie] Yves, I can see that this has very small impact in fact. Nevertheless, it is confusing things. It allows to define a sequence of one (which is a theroretical nonsense) that has effectively the same semantic as canReoder="yes", which is much worse than just being theoretically wrong or ugly. This said I am not against IFF we add a note explaining that sequence of one was allowed to simplify extraction and has actually no impact. Alternatively, we could normatively allow Modifiers (add a PR) to clean up and kill sequences of one, replacing isolated "fisrtNo" with "yes" or deleting it since "yes" is the default I suppose.. Cheers dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote: Hi all,
]]
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]