[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [asap] Conference call Tue Dec 7
Hi,
I won't be able to make today's call so here is where I am
with my stuff.
Draft Participants brochure sent to Keith (also attached)
for comments - awaiting feedback.
Spoke to Uwe Roediger from IDS Scheer. Sent him pointers to
the information on the WfMC site, OASIS site. Gave him a run down of what we
were trying to achieve with the Feb demo. He is concerned that he doesn't have
much resource to direct at this demo. They are also trying to decide what
is the best industry standard XML based process definition to use for
import and export which they see as a decision between XPDL and BPEL. So he
doesn't want to put effort into XPDL if they subsequently decide to use BPEL.
One possibility I discussed was that they just implement the necessary parts of
Wf-XML and ASAP to do the interoperability and we perhaps just exchange an ARIS
AML definition and import it into Staffware using its conversion tool. The other
thing I thought of afterwards was that if the XPDL definition was simple enough
whether a simple transformation from AML to XPDL might suffice. Uwe was going to
digest the information I sent him and get back to me with some questions - he
hasn't so I chased him but have received nothing back yet.
So far I have not been able to contact Bernard Fisher at
Popkin. I've left a message for him so hopefully he will get back to me
soon.
I contacted Arnaud Bezacon at Advantys concerning the
simple XPDL definition he had promised to generate at the last WfMC meeting. He
told me that he had already sent them to Keith but then sent them to me as well.
I believe that they are probably too complex for our needs as they include
participants and we had been trying to use an automated process to make it
easier to demonstrate.
I contacted our BPEL expert Danny van der Rijn to see if he
could design us a simple BPEL process along the lines that Keith has suggested
(and provided). Initially feedback looked promising until he looked into what he
would need to do to generate a simple process and it turned out that it wouldn't
be that simple and his customer commitments wouldn't give him time to progress
it.
We are in the process of re-implementing
our C# ASAP demo ware into something we're happier with architecturally in Java.
We have now got a version that implements all of what we had before but in a
more flexible way and implements what we think are the necessary parts of Wf-XML
2.0 to list and exchange the process definitions. i.e. ListDefinitions, AddDefinition, GetDefinition,
SetDefinition
Cheers
Justin
From: Sameer Pradhan [mailto:sameerp@us.fujitsu.com] Sent: 07 December 2004 17:16 To: ASAP (E-mail) Subject: [asap] Conference call Tue Dec 7
ASAP TC
members, Regards, |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]